Marques, M; Monteiro, R and Delgado, R (2018) An improved model for seismic risk assessment in Portugal. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 9(1), pp. 70-83. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: Portugal experienced very destructive earthquakes in the past, such as the well-known “Lisbon earthquake” in 1755. With such in mind, accurate estimates of human and economic losses can play a significant role in providing various societal key players with objective information for response strategies. This paper aims to present the contribution of the most recent study in Portugal (PRISE) concerning comprehensive seismic risk assessment, which can be used as good practice and reproduced in different contexts. Design/methodology/approach: PRISE (earthquake loss assessment of the Portuguese building stock) covered three main lines of research, corresponding to the three components typically considered in any seismic risk assessment study: the characterization of the seismic hazard, the identification of the exposure to earthquakes and loss potential and the vulnerability of the exposed assets. Each of these components has been fully characterized through the collection of census and local data (exposure), used to carry out nonlinear analysis (hazard and fragility). Findings: By involving different research institutions and partners with extensive knowledge and expertise in the earthquake domains, the developed model is capable of producing economic and human earthquake loss estimates in real time (through an innovative Web-based platform) or for specific event scenarios, considering exposed population, residential and industrial buildings. The platform uses open-source tools and hence, it can be reproduced in other countries or contexts. Research limitations/implications: Research wise, the hazard, vulnerability and exposure models can still be significantly improved, e.g. by adding critical infrastructure (hospitals, school buildings and bridges) or updating the nonlinear models, for more accurate loss predictions. Practical implications: The findings and loss estimates for different earthquake scenarios show that planned interventions are required. Decision-makers and other relevant stakeholders (Civil Protection) can make use of the developed platform to produce specific estimates, to test the effect of different retrofitting interventions or to plan for emergency scenarios. Originality/value: A real-time Web-based framework to estimate building damage and economic/human losses because of seismic events has been developed, aiming to provide the Portuguese Civil Protection and other playmakers with a unique platform for planning and preparing for emergency scenarios.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | exposure; hazard; loss estimation; real-time platform; seismic risk; vulnerability |
| Index terms: | strategy, building stock, exposure, retrofitting, school building, population, methodology, vulnerability, loss estimation, good practice, Portugal, research institution, seismic risk, real-time platform, platform, critical infrastructure, estimate, Lisbon, earthquake, real time |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, environmental hazards, project controls, demography, research management, asset management, Geography, financial risk, digital design, performance measurement, management, renovation and retrofit, research methods, public and environmental health, financial and cost management, construction type |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Sustainability, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Time Control, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here