Mohtat, N and Zargar, A H I (2018) Sustainability evaluation of post-disaster housing reconstruction after 55 years: Rudak Village, Iran. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 9(4-5), pp. 294-316. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: Focusing on Rudak, a village destroyed in the Buin-Zahra earthquake of 1962 in Qazvin, Iran, this paper aims to evaluate the reconstruction of this village in terms of sustainability. Rudak reconstruction has left long-term consequences on the physical structure of the village, as some of the people refused the constructed houses and built their own ones. Hence, after more than 50 years, this village is now consisted of two physically different neighborhoods. Examining the long-term consequences of this reconstruction through comparing housing and physical structure of the two different neighborhoods contains valuable lessons in terms of sustainability because sustainable reconstruction results unveil in long term. Design/methodology/approach: Using sustainable reconstruction theory as the conceptual framework, this research investigates social, economic and environmental sustainability of Rudak housing reconstruction and that leads to comprehensive lessons. The study has a qualitative method and is based on fieldwork allowing for dynamic interviews with the community. Furthermore, data are analyzed through descriptive and comparative approaches. Findings: The research concluded that sustainability related implications of post-disaster reconstruction policies are not restricted to the time of reconstruction or a limited interval after that. Lack of livelihood considerations, providing all people with similar houses and nontransparent decisions, resulted in unsustainable consequences such as building vulnerable extensions by people, social segregation and people unwillingness for participation. However, this experience was sustainable in terms of some other factors. For example, using local materials for building the structures of the new houses, putting the houses on the natural bedrock and building public services for people were sustainable measurements. Originality/value: This paper is a rare example of research focusing on impacts of post-disaster reconstruction after more than 50 years. It contains valuable lessons for planners and architects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | buin-zahra earthquake; earthquake; Iran; post disaster reconstruction; rudak; sustainable reconstruction |
| Index terms: | reconstruction, public services, architect, post-disaster reconstruction, planner, local material, earthquake, housing reconstruction, interview, qualitative method, sustainable reconstruction, methodology, post-disaster housing reconstruction, housing, environmental sustainability, conceptual framework |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, profession, construction type, research design and methodology, building materials, theoretical framing, design practice, economic development, research methods, post-disaster and reconstruction, health safety and environment, building construction, administrative law, environmental hazards |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here