Rahouti, A; Datoussaïd, S and Descamps, T (2018) Safety assessment of a high-rise dormitory in case of fire. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 9(1), pp. 84-95. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to focus on the combination of fire- and agent-based modelling approaches to assess the level of safety of a multi-storeyed building case study. Design/methodology/approach: For an existing building to be occupied such as the engineering student dormitory of Mons (Belgium), engineers must establish, among the other things, that the building affords a sufficient level of safety during fire incident. This can be verified in accordance with prescriptive- and performance-based methodologies. The performance-based approach consists on using simulation tools such as fire dynamics simulator with evacuation to ensure/verify the level of safety required. In this paper, a model case study was built and then various scenarios have been implemented to answer some safety questions. Findings: For this building layout, the results demonstrate that combining different egress components (i.e. stairs and outdoor ladders) has a negative impact on the evacuation process than using only the stairs to evacuate the building; phased evacuation strategy will not necessarily lead to faster evacuation; adding fire doors in the stairs and between the floors has a beneficial effect on the evacuation process. Originality/value: This case study proposes some recommendations about adapted evacuation strategy and investments to improve the safety of high-rise student’s dormitory in case of fire.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | agent-based modelling; evacuation; fire; high-rise dormitory; risk management; safety |
| Index terms: | strategy, Belgium, high-rise dormitory, simulation tool, performance-based, methodology, dormitory, engineer, agent-based modelling, case study, dynamics, risk management |
| Subjects: | systems engineering, research methods, management, performance measurement, Geography, modelling and simulation, analytical methods, data collection methods, profession, risk assessment, construction type |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here