Virtual training environments for major incident response planning in UK gas infrastructure

Rogage, K (2018) Virtual training environments for major incident response planning in UK gas infrastructure. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 9(2), pp. 130-144. ISSN 1759-5916

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to evaluate a virtual training environment for testing UK gas pipeline emergency response plans. Design/methodology/approach: Interviews, observations and desk research were used to identify current methods for testing plans. A virtual training environment was developed and evaluated with industry experts by using participatory design techniques. Key themes relating to both the current methods for testing plans and for a virtual training environment were identified using thematic analysis. Findings: Improved training performance, remote participation and evidence of decision testing are benefits a virtual training environment can bring to current practice. It is suggested that a virtual training environment can enhance, rather than replace, the current process of testing emergency response plans. Research limitations/implications: Analysis of the virtual training environment being used to test plans in a live context would give further ecological validity to the findings. A study of the prototype used to test plans for incidents involving sectors outside the gas industry would further validate the findings. Originality/value: The application of a virtual training environment to facilitate testing plans and the decision-making processes for major incidents involving high-pressure gas pipelines and storage sites is yet to be documented. This paper contributes to the literature by documenting the decision-making process and evaluation of a virtual training environment for testing plans in this context.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: emergency response planning; emergency response training; gas infrastructure; major incidents; multi-agency response; virtual training environment
Index terms: validity, emergency response planning, decision-making process, gas industry, pipeline, testing, prototype, emergency response, interview, emergency response plan, agency, thematic analysis, evidence, methodology, participatory design
Subjects: industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology, decision analysis, methods and analysis, health safety and environment, safety engineering, research methods, professional practice, modelling and simulation, design methods, risk assessment, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods
Topics: Design Practice, Risk Management, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here