Asgary, A and Azimi, N (2019) Choice of emergency shelter: Valuing key attributes of emergency shelters. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 10(2-3), pp. 130-150. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine people’s preferences for some of the key attributes of emergency shelters, including type, privacy level, location, spatial arrangement and pet-friendliness. Design/methodology/approach: Choice experiment (CE) method was used in this study. A standard CE questionnaire was designed and completed by a sample of 293 residents of the Greater Toronto Area, Ontario (Canada), during the winter of 2015. Findings: When using publicly provided shelters, people prefer to stay in hotels, places of worship and then community shelters, in that order. These findings correspond to the values that they place for various attributes through the CE survey. Findings show that responders place the highest values for emergency shelters that provide more privacy, located close to their home, and are pet friendly. Type of shelter and the “arrangement” attributes were not found to be as important and valuable. Research limitations/implications: This study uses a convenient sampling method as such may not fully represent the study population. Practical implications: Emergency shelter provision by local, regional and national governments cost significant amount of money and thus it is important that the society get the maximum benefit from it. This will be possible when users' preferences are considered in planning, design, and operation of emergency shelters. The findings enable emergency managers to perform cost-benefit analysis an increase the efficiency of emergency shelters. Originality/value: While previous studies have examined emergency-shelter types, characteristics and user-satisfaction levels, this is a novel study because it uses a choice experiment method to extract monetary values for key emergency-shelter attributes.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | choice experiment method; emergency rest centre; emergency shelter; Greater Toronto area; reception centre; shelter planning |
| Index terms: | experiment, survey, winter, manager, key attribute, society, preference, population, methodology, privacy, questionnaire, Canada, emergency shelter, efficiency, satisfaction, Toronto, hotel, sampling |
| Subjects: | construction type, risk assessment, data collection methods, practitioner, climate science, project delivery, performance management, decision-making and reasoning, research methods, Geography, demography, communities and social development, professional ethics |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here