City-to-city exchange: Redefining "resilience" in the Arab region

Eltinay, N (2019) City-to-city exchange: Redefining "resilience" in the Arab region. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 10(4), pp. 222-238. ISSN 1759-5916

Abstract

Purpose: It might seem plausible to argue that effective monitoring of disaster data loss can help achieve progress in reporting to the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (SFDRR) and the global targets of sustainable development goals and associated indicators. Nevertheless, with the lack of climate change and disaster data losses in the Arab region, the integration of risks associated with socio-economic dimensions at the wider scale of displacement is important to shape a regional understanding of resilience terminology and provides the means of translating it. The purpose of this paper is to identify the means of redefining “Resilience” in the Arab region context of climate change, conflict and displacement in association with the theoretical principles of the “fragile city”. Design/methodology/approach: In an attempt to achieve the SFDRR target (E) “substantially increase the number of countries with national and local DRR strategies by 2020,” this study investigates the use of the (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction) disaster resilience scorecard as a guiding principle for city-to-city (C2C) resilience-building knowledge exchange between Amman (Jordan) and Khartoum (Sudan). Findings: Facing similar urban challenges against disaster and violent conflict-protracted displacement, the study findings indicate that the C2C exchange program was useful in understanding the cities' urban risk profiles, promoting dialogue among local governments and creating a culture of learning organizations for knowledge sharing on DRR governance and beyond. However, the applied resilience assessments overlooked the qualitative and socio-ecological understanding of climate change risk and human security principles among the most vulnerable groups of refugees and internally displaced persons in fragile settings. This is recommended to be integrated into building coherence for resilience across the 2015-2030 Global Agendas reporting and monitoring mechanisms, leaving “no one behind”. Originality/value: The C2C exchange program for Amman and Khartoum was an opportunity for understanding the cities' urban risk profiles, addressing challenges and building “decentralized cooperation” beyond the cities' institutional boundaries (UN Habitat, 2001), with recommendations for “selecting resilience indicators specific to fragile cities” to quantitatively measure disaster displaced persons' (DDPs) vulnerabilities and current status of “income and social equality, microeconomic security, provision of basic services and social protection” while providing qualitative evidence on “social cohesion, social networks/social support and local government–community cooperation” (Patel and Nosal, 2016).

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Arab region; city-to-city exchange; disaster risk reduction; displacement; fragility; resilience
Index terms: resilience indicator, local government, knowledge sharing, disaster resilience, strategy, social network, scorecard, coherence, vulnerability, evidence, integration, methodology, social cohesion, program, disaster risk reduction, boundaries, climate change, cooperation, social protection, governance, Amman, United Nations, vulnerable group, sustainable development goal, refugee, knowledge exchange, monitoring, income, Sudan, dimension, Jordan
Subjects: administrative law, communities and social development, environmental hazards, organizational analysis, demography, sociology, sustainable design, Geography, performance measurement, management, research methods, software systems, knowledge management, property law, health monitoring assessment and metrics, economic analysis, institutional frameworks, psychology, human factors and perception, control systems, climate science, risk assessment, evaluation and assessment methods, business
Topics: Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Information Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Governance, Sustainability, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Legal Issues, Quality Management, Site Management, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here