Firouzi Jahantigh, F and Jannat, F (2019) Analyzing the sequence and interrelations of Natech disasters in urban areas using interpretive structural modelling (ISM). International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 10(5), pp. 392-407. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: Natural disasters such as earthquake, flood and hurricane always threaten human life and societies. A major challenge is technological hazards triggered by such disasters, especially in metropolises and urban areas. Thus, these hazards have been the focus of interest in many countries, and suitable crisis management plans have been made to address them. The purpose of this study was to cluster technological hazards caused by natural disasters in urban areas. Design/methodology/approach: According to literature, a set of 15 technological hazards was identified whose magnificence and interrelations were analysed using interpretive structural modelling technique. DEMATEL technique was used to determine internal relations among the hazards and to draw a network relation map. Findings: The results revealed that dam failing, water supply disruption and building collapse form the base of the structural model. Originality/value: The authors developed a structural model representing the hierarchy and interrelations among various elements of technological hazards caused by natural disaster. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this was the first attempt to reveal internal relations of Natech factors. Finally, some recommendations were proposed for crisis management according to research findings.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | dam failing; ISM; Natech; natural disaster; technological hazard |
| Index terms: | crisis management, water supply, urban area, interpretive structural modelling, society, methodology, natural disaster, earthquake |
| Subjects: | environmental hazards, data analysis and analytics, research methods, financial risk, communities and social development, urban form and morphology, infrastructure and transport systems |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Cost Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Urban Studies, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here