Martins, A N and Rocha, A (2019) Risk and resilient architectural practices in informal settlements: the role of NGOs. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 10(4), pp. 276-288. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to understand the role played by small-size non-governmental organisations (NGOs) in slum upgrading, building and incremental housing processes in Brazil and Guinea-Bissau, focusing, in particular, on actions to reduce vulnerabilities and enhance community resilience. Design/methodology/approach: The research method relied on literature review and fieldwork. It included surveys, activities with the communities, interviews and questionnaires. The data collected were subject to cross-disciplinary and comparative analysis. Findings: The paper analyses the innovative methods and solutions used by NGOs in informal settlement upgrading and housing improvement works related to disaster risk reduction, namely, community mapping and design, and show how they end up building community resilience. Research limitations/implications: Grasping the impacts of NGOs' work whether in slums of Brazil or Africa requires staying with communities for a significant amount of time. However, those stays raise many practical problems regarding security, health and related costs. Originality/value: The existing literature misses to address from a comparative perspective, the methods used by social workers and designers teams in slums. This paper aims at filling this gap in slum studies. Its originality and value rely on the particular experience of the authors, who were personally involved in the NGOs actions and could deepen the connections between vulnerabilities, risk and successful aid-self-help practices.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | favelas; Guiné-Bissau; incremental housing; informal settlements; risk and resilience; slum upgrading |
| Index terms: | interview, Brazil, literature review, survey, comparative analysis, upgrading, mapping, methodology, vulnerability, questionnaire, disaster risk reduction, housing, community resilience, Africa, designer, informal settlement, architectural practice, building community, Guinea-Bissau, slum, non-governmental organization |
| Subjects: | construction type, profession, strategic management, data collection methods, business, community and social dimensions, data analysis and analytics, regions and continents, spatial and geospatial analysis, research methods, Geography, urban design, social equity, housing and residential development, political science, environmental hazards |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Construction Technology, Governance, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here