Risk perception and awareness of earthquake: The case of Dhaka

Rahman, M L (2019) Risk perception and awareness of earthquake: The case of Dhaka. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 10(1), pp. 65-82. ISSN 1759-5916

Abstract

Purpose: Among the many studies about risk perception, only a few deal with Bangladesh. Paul and Bhuiyan’s (2010) study has shown the earthquake-preparedness level of residents of Dhaka, but there are some biases in the data collection. This paper aims to examine the seismic-risk perception and the level of knowledge on earthquake and preparedness among the residents of Dhaka. Design/methodology/approach: A questionnaire was developed, and data collection was undertaken through home and sidewalk surveys. This paper investigates how attitude, perception and behavior differ depending on gender, age, education and casualty awareness. This research tries to examine and make a comparison of the risk perception and preparedness level between different groups of gender, age and level of education. Findings: This research shows that female respondents have a much better risk perception of and are better prepared for earthquakes than male respondents; younger people have a higher knowledge about earthquake preparedness than older people and less-educated people are at a higher risk of unpreparedness than more-educated people. Research limitations/implications: This research is only limited to the Dhaka Division. Originality/value: This paper concludes by noting that public awareness on seismic-risk perception and mitigation is poor, and their knowledge on basic theory and emergency response must be improved.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: awareness; earthquakes; risk analysis; risk perception; seismic; vulnerability
Index terms: Bangladesh, earthquake, survey, risk perception, emergency response, risk analysis, mitigation, vulnerability, questionnaire, bias, methodology, older people
Subjects: environmental hazards, demography, probability and distributions, financial risk, Geography, safety engineering, research methods, data collection methods
Topics: Sustainability, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here