Seismic fragility assessment of ductile reinforced concrete building frames

Apu, N and Sinha, R (2020) Seismic fragility assessment of ductile reinforced concrete building frames. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 12(4), pp. 425-442. ISSN 1759-5916

Abstract

Purpose: Increasing awareness of the society and complying with design requirements of building codes for seismic safety of structures and inhabitants during severe earthquakes are the primary purpose of seismic analysis. This study aims to present the variability in seismic fragility functions for frames of different heights for the most vulnerable condition of structure using nonlinear time history analysis. Design/methodology/approach: A total of 4, 8 and 20 stories reinforced concrete (RC) moment-resisting two-dimensional frames are considered for this study. Ground motions (GM) are selected as per the conditional mean spectrum and these are conditioned on a target spectral acceleration at the concern time period. RC frames are designed and detailed as per Indian standards. A concentrated plasticity approach is adopted for non-linear analytical modeling of the RC frames. Deterministic capacity limit states in terms of maximum inter-story drift ratio are considered for different damage states. Fragility functions have been derived following a lognormal distribution from incremental dynamic analysis curves. Finally, the maximum likelihood estimation of the response is obtained for fitting curves with observed fragility. Findings: The fragility functions of the three structures reflect that under critical or extreme conditions of GM the taller buildings have higher fragility than the shorter buildings for each level of limit states even though both are designed to meet their code-level design forces. Research limitations/implications: The study is conducted on the extreme scenario of GM conditioned on the fundamental time period of each building, whereas comparison can be developed by selecting various methodologies of GM set. The probabilistic capacity model can be developed for future studies to check the fragility variation with deterministic and probabilistic capacity. Originality/value: The investigation endeavors to present a comprehensive fragility assessment framework by analytical method. The outcome will be useful in the development of a disaster management strategy for new or old buildings and the response of seismic force with a variation of the building’s height. The findings will also be useful for updating the earthquake-resistant building codes for the new building construction in a similar context.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: conditional mean spectrum; fragility analysis; ground motion suite; incremental dynamic analysis; performance-based design; rc frames building
Index terms: strategy, building construction, society, history, building code, performance-based, variation, methodology, reinforced concrete, estimation, modelling, disaster management, acceleration, future study, variability, earthquake, investigation
Subjects: research methods, management, performance measurement, financial risk, contractual condition, building construction, project controls, environmental hazards, statistical analysis, communities and social development, regulatory law, research design and methodology, data collection methods, building materials, architectural and construction history, financial and cost management, analytical methods
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Time Control, Contract Administration, Legal Issues, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here