Garakani, S A; Lak, A and Niyasati, M (2020) Toward sustainable development in post-flood relocation of rural settlements in Iran. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 11(3), pp. 359-377. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: Man has always faced natural hazards and thus attempted to reduce their financial and loss-of-life damages. Assuring sustainable development in the post-disaster reconstruction of areas requires predictive measurements (i.e. vulnerability assessment). This study aims to assess the outcomes of relocating villages after the 2005 flood in the east of Golestan Province in Iran through sustainable development. Design/methodology/approach: This study is an applied research combining qualitative content analysis and quantitative cross-sectional surveys. The statistical population comprises the inhabitants of Faraghi New Town (formed by aggregating 11 villages) and the villagers returning to their former rural settlement. The independent samples t-test was used to compare the outcomes of reconstruction for the samples. Data were collected using a questionnaire and in-depth interviews with the residents. The gathered data were analyzed by content analysis. Findings: The results indicate that building new settlements – while reducing physical vulnerability – cannot be classified as a step toward sustainable development in economic and social aspects because the increasing trend of migration to urban areas, return to former villages, tribal disparities, reduced production, increased bank debts and increased urban insecurity are among the primary adverse social and economic consequences of rural relocations. This finding helps to assist planners and post-disaster designers to reconstruct more sustainable societies. Originality/value: This study tries to investigate the effects of post-disaster reconstruction in rural settlement in Iran through sustainable development aspects for the first time. It would benefit for policymaking and urban planners and designers to make more resilient societies after disasters.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Golestan province; Iran; post-disaster reconstruction; settlement relocation; sustainable development; vulnerability |
| Index terms: | social aspect, vulnerability, questionnaire, population, urban area, methodology, natural hazard, relocation, survey, damages, content analysis, sustainable development, society, interview, disparity, planner, post-disaster reconstruction, designer, migration, reconstruction |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, dispute resolution, profession, data collection methods, communities and social development, environmental hazards, market analysis, demography, social justice, sociology, building construction, health safety and environment, post-disaster and reconstruction, urban form and morphology, research methods |
| Topics: | Ethics, Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here