Soetanto, R; Hermawan, F; Milne, A; Hatmoko, J U D; As'ad, S and He, C (2020) Developing sustainable arrangements for "proactive" disaster risk financing in Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 11(3), pp. 435-451. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: Recent years saw a paradigm shift from ex post (reactive) to ex ante (proactive) approaches (e.g. insurance) to disaster risk financing for building resilience of communities in developing countries. To facilitate adoption, the approaches should be adapted so that they can be technically feasible and culturally desirable to the local context. This paper aims to report an exploratory study to elaborate the existing arrangements to deal with the impacts of disaster and the potential to shift to a more proactive disaster risk financing in Indonesia. Design/methodology/approach: A series of stakeholder engagement activities in Semarang and Solo, Indonesia was conducted to ascertain the existing arrangements for disaster risk financing at local government level, the challenges/barriers to the adoption of insurance, education and policies to facilitate the transformation from reactive to proactive process. Thematic analysis was applied to transcribed conversations during interviews, focus groups and workshops. Identification of emerging issues/themes was also guided by the researchers' notes during the events, and facilitated by qualitative analysis software, Atlas Ti®. This was complemented by an analysis of regulations and documents provided by the local stakeholders. Findings: The local governments heavily rely on contingency fund, which is not enough and often significantly delayed to fund recovery and reconstruction of public infrastructure. The use of insurance is limited in both public and private sectors, particularly in the majority of low-income communities. Various barriers and challenges were identified under several categories, namely, institutional, cultural, affordability, lack of awareness and knowledge, insurance arrangement process and lack of trust. The findings also suggest that improving insurance education should involve multiple stakeholders, and both formal and informal routes should be pursued. Originality/value: The research fills the gap of knowledge in disaster risk financing in the context of developing countries, specifically in local governments and communities in Indonesia. The findings may be replicable for other developing countries with low adoption of ex ante financial instruments for dealing with the impacts of disaster. Robby Soetanto, Ferry Hermawan, Alistair Milne, Jati Utomo Dwi Hatmoko, Sholihin As’ad and Chusu He.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | community; developing countries; disaster risk financing; financial instruments; flooding; insurance |
| Index terms: | insurance, paradigm, income, stakeholder engagement, private sector, transformation, recovery, Indonesia, reconstruction, public infrastructure, workshop, financing, affordability, methodology, regulation, thematic analysis, documents, qualitative analysis, flooding, exploratory study, local government, interview, developing country, disaster risk, focus group |
| Subjects: | construction type, data collection methods, research design and methodology, business, community and social dimensions, operations management, economic analysis, education and knowledge transfer, research methods, methods and analysis, Geography, financial risk, professional development, development economics, building construction, infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis, administrative law, political science, environmental hazards |
| Topics: | International Construction, Legal Issues, Construction Technology, Governance, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here