Hawken, S; Sunindijo, R Y and Sanderson, D (2021) Narratives of everyday resilience: Lessons from an urban kampung community in Surabaya, Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 12(2), pp. 196-208. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to discuss what people perceive as risks and resilience factors, and how they build everyday resilience. Design/methodology/approach: The study focuses on Kampung (literally “village”) Plampitan, a neighbourhood in the inner-city part of Surabaya. The research used field observation, in-depth interviews and workshops during community meetings to collect data. Findings: The results show how people respond to daily risks and find the support necessary to survive. The problems and risks revealed in the study include crime and economic difficulties, such as unemployment and insufficient income. Coping strategies identified are classified into place-based adaption, people-based network and political network. These strategies can serve as a starting point for local communities to assess their resilience and assist them in enhancing “everyday” resilience. Originality/value: The paper argues that the concept of resilience must go beyond top-down approaches to disaster risk management and integrate bottom-up understanding from the perspective of local people, especially among marginal and disadvantaged communities. The paper develops the emerging and overlooked concept of “everyday resilience” and suggests that it is essential in surviving both “everyday” or small-scale chronic risks and large-scale disasters.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bottom-up; community resilience; Indonesia; kampung; Surabaya; urban resilience |
| Index terms: | strategy, interview, disaster risk, unemployment, urban resilience, narrative, methodology, Indonesia, workshop, community resilience, income, coping |
| Subjects: | sustainability and resilience, economic analysis, data collection methods, construction type, behavioral psychology, management, research methods, qualitative and interpretive research, Geography, social equity, financial risk |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here