Izumi, T; Sukhwani, V; Surjan, A and Shaw, R (2021) Managing and responding to pandemics in higher educational institutions: Initial learning from COVID-19. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 12(1), pp. 51-66. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to understand the key challenges, approaches and lessons of the higher educational institutions (HEIs) in the context of COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach: A survey was conducted to understand the key challenges being faced by the HEIs around the world during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 150 responses were collected from 65 universities, located in 29 countries. Findings: The results show that 47% of respondents with defined universities believe their institutions lacked a permanent or dedicated emergency management office, and 41% said their HEIs lacked a general business continuity plan for an emergency. In universities with BCPs, 33% of the plans do not cover biological hazards and pandemic risk management, and 60% of the plans did not include conducting any advanced simulation exercises. More than 70% the responded said their instruction, information sharing and decision-making process were timely and open. The major challenges identified were a lack of adequate preparedness for pandemic and of pandemic-specific advanced simulation exercises. The next major challenges were the change in the mode of teaching to online lectures and working from home. Based on these challenges, a set of short- and long-term recommendations were proposed. Originality/value: This was the first survey in academic institutions in post COVID-19 context. The findings will be useful for preparing for biological and other related hazards.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | community and local government collaboration; COVID-19; online classes; shifting academic calendar; university responses |
| Index terms: | decision-making process, COVID-19, business continuity, risk management, pandemic, local government, information sharing, exercise, methodology, emergency management, collaboration, survey |
| Subjects: | risk assessment, financial risk, data collection methods, health behaviours and lifestyles, management, administrative law, health risk and incident analysis, project risk, data exchange, research methods, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Risk Management, Cost Management, Digital Applications, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here