Probable maximum loss of a pipe network due to earthquakes: A case study in iloilo city, Philippines

Jarder, S L N; Garciano, L E O and Maruyama, O (2021) Probable maximum loss of a pipe network due to earthquakes: A case study in iloilo city, Philippines. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 12(2), pp. 223-237. ISSN 1759-5916

Abstract

Purpose: Buried structures like pipeline systems or water distribution networks (WDN) are vulnerable to seismic activities and the risk of damages increases when there is liquefaction. This paper aims to propose a methodology on how to determine the probable maximum loss (PML) on pipeline systems when earthquakes and liquefaction occur in future scenarios. Design/methodology/approach: The paper used historical data and presents a case study on how the methodology to estimate the PML was used. The estimation is analytic and relied on simulations to determine the seismic and liquefaction hazard in the study area. Statistical and numerical analysis was used to estimate the damages and losses. Findings: The output shows the PML of a WDN at different earthquake scenarios. It also shows a comparison between the damages and losses of diameter sizes of the pipes. Research limitations/implications: In this paper, the damages behaved independently in one area, and correlation was not considered. Practical implications: This PML methodology can aid in pre-disaster planning to prepare for seismic countermeasures risk transfer such as insurance to reduce the loss. Originality/value: This paper shows a methodology and example on how to estimate the damages and PMLs of an existing WDN of a projected earthquake and liquefaction hazard based on historical data.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: earthquake; hazard mapping; liquefaction; pipelines; probable maximum loss; seismic analysis
Index terms: estimation, case study, pipeline, disaster planning, estimate, earthquake, insurance, damages, numerical analysis, Philippines, water distribution network, hazard mapping, methodology
Subjects: data collection methods, dispute resolution, financial and cost management, economic analysis, data analysis and analytics, research methods, financial risk, Geography, environmental hazards, infrastructure and transport systems
Topics: Sustainability, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here