Linh, T N Q; Hanh, T T T and Shaw, R (2021) COVID-19 initial preparedness and response in Vietnam during the first six months of the pandemic and the lessons for Sendai framework implementation. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 12(1), pp. 143-155. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to analyze the current responses applied in Vietnam to the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic and link these measures to priority actions highlighted in the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (SFDRR). From there, strengths, limitations and recommendations on applying the SFDRR to build the pandemic resilience in the future are discussed. Design/methodology/approach: The authors synthesize literature on response measures to the COVID-19 pandemic in Vietnam from January to June 2020 and compare to four priority actions of the SFDRR including understanding risk, strengthening governance, investing in risk reduction for resilience and enhancing preparedness for effective response and resilient recovery. Findings: Vietnam has effectively controlled the pandemic with 401 infected cases and no death so far. Well preparation, timely policies' implementation, risk communication and comprehensive approaches are key strategies. These measures are same as the four priority actions in the SFDRR. Originality/value: To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study in Vietnam to link the COVID-19 response and the SFDRR, which can serve as an important example for other countries in responding to the pandemic. Some measures have surpassed SFDRR’s guidance, especially preventive responses applied nationwide with strong political will and the community’s commitment accompanied by sanctions. Cultural factors such as the habit of using masks to prevent air pollution have contributed to the good observance of wearing mask regulations during the pandemic. However, some areas that need more attention include specific solutions for vulnerable groups, limiting fake news and ensuring patient privacy.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | COVID-19; preparedness; response; Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction; SFDRR; Vietnam |
| Index terms: | methodology, regulation, privacy, strengthening, disaster risk reduction, habit, air pollution, COVID-19, Vietnam, risk reduction, commitment, strategy, implementation, coronavirus, recovery, pandemic, governance, vulnerable group |
| Subjects: | communities and social development, professional ethics, political science, environmental hazards, health conditions and diseases, Geography, financial risk, structural engineering, management, health risk and incident analysis, research methods, contractual arrangements, psychology, operations management, health behaviours and lifestyles, climate science, business |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Governance, Sustainability, Procurement, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here