Islam, S T; Akand, M K; Islam, M N; Samad, S and Rishal, F H (2022) Systems thinking approach for disaster resilient and climate smart agriculture in Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 13(3), pp. 286-303. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: Linear and narrow focus of climate change and disaster impact assessments on agriculture turns out as a limiting factor to understand how impact conditions trigger changes in the whole system resulting to make problems complicated. The paper aims to identify the micro-level challenges of the agriculture sector and then shows how macro-level planning could be developed and may help the rural peasants of Bangladesh to better cope with the adverse conditions generated as a result of disaster impacts and/or climate change-induced threats. Design/methodology/approach: The paper, based on a secondary literature review and primary data generated by the author, shows that agriculture happens as a system where many microelements and processes contribute and benefits from it do not only confine into the final product generation. Using both the primary and secondary data, the paper shows how simplistic approaches to assess disaster impacts on agriculture in Bangladesh are taking place and thus leaving scopes to read properly the more complex and cyclic forms of hazard impacts in the sector by using the systems thinking approach and complex systems methodology. Findings: The paper finally suggests how a better and comprehensive understanding of disaster and climate change impacts on agriculture would provide arguments for mainstreaming climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction actions into regular development planning of the government. Originality/value: The authors declare that this submission is their own work, and, to the best of the authors' knowledge, it contains no materials previously published or written by another person or substantial proportions of material which have been accepted for the award of anywhere else.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | risk reduction |
| Index terms: | complex system, secondary data, adaptation, Bangladesh, literature review, mainstreaming, risk reduction, systems thinking, climate change, disaster risk reduction, methodology, impact assessment |
| Subjects: | systems engineering, environmental hazards, financial risk, Geography, research methods, analytical methods, data analysis and analytics, value management, climate science, user focus, business, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Sustainability, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here