Jaiswal, A; Kumar, A; Pal, I; Raisinghani, B and Bhoraniya, T H (2022) Sustainable management of coastal critical infrastructure: Case study of multi-purpose cyclone shelters in South Asia. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 13(3), pp. 304-326. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: To minimize risk of coastal communities arising from cyclones, several risk mitigation initiatives have been taken in countries. Cyclone shelters have proven to be an important critical infrastructure in saving lives from cyclones. A large number of coastal critical infrastructure in the form of multi-purpose cyclone shelters (MPCS) are built to provide safe shelter during disasters. Often observed, such critical infrastructures are non-operational during the normal period, which makes them difficult to use during any disaster. Efforts have been made to keep these infrastructures in working condition. This research paper aims to bring together various management practices adopted for the MPCS in the South-Asian region with a focus on Bangladesh, and India. It also suggests ways to improve these practices for sustainable management of the MPCS. Design/methodology/approach: India and Bangladesh are the most vulnerable countries in the South Asian region. As per the Global Climate Index, India and Bangladesh come in the list of “in extreme risk” countries in the world and are vulnerable to several natural hazards, especially climate-induced hydrometeorological hazards. India has a vast coastline and out of 7,516 km of coastline, a large extent, i.e. 5,700 km is prone to cyclones and that keeps 40% of the population vulnerable living within 100 km of the coastline. On the other hand, Bangladesh has a coastline of 580 km, which is equally vulnerable to tropical cyclones. Safeguarding communities from impending coastal risk through coastal cyclone shelters are of prime concern. This paper uses a qualitative approach to analyze secondary data, and literature in the field of critical infrastructure, sustainability, cyclone shelter, and management practice for cyclone shelters. Findings: To provide sustainability and community ownership of the MPCS, various service plans are adopted in different countries. This paper provides insights on service and sustainability efforts made for the proper functioning of the MPCS in India and Bangladesh. It also provides insight into the roles played by different institutions involved in maintaining the MPCSs. Originality/value: The research reiterates understanding of the cyclone shelter management from different geographic locations in the South Asian region. Various gaps identified in shelter management practices are discussed in the paper and key recommendations are proposed for better management of cyclone shelters.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Bangladesh; critical infrastructure; cyclone; India; multi-purpose cyclone shelter; sustainable management |
| Index terms: | Bangladesh, methodology, natural hazard, management practice, cyclone, coastline, secondary data, case study, India, Asia, tropical cyclone, qualitative approach, critical infrastructure, ownership, population, risk mitigation, sustainable management, research paper |
| Subjects: | management, health safety and environment, data collection methods, infrastructure and transport systems, financial risk, environmental hazards, regions and continents, climate science, economics, research methods, Geography, demography, physical geography and landforms, research dissemination and communication |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Geographical Context, Information Management, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Urban Studies, Sustainability, Research Practice, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here