Mohanty, S; Dabral, A; Chatterjee, R and Shaw, R (2022) Shelter management during pandemics: Lessons from cascading risks of cyclones and COVID-19. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 13(1), pp. 72-88. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: The concept of multi-purpose cyclone shelters has been found effective in saving various lives during past cyclones. The recent cyclone Amphan, which hit the Indian states of Odisha and West Bengal in the middle of pandemic COVID-19 has posed severe issues related to cyclone shelter management in the rural areas. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the case of Odisha in a pandemic and draw some key lessons of cyclone shelter management, which can be useful for future cascading risks in other parts of the country and the region. Design/methodology/approach: Cyclone shelters are critical infrastructures in the management of cyclones, associated hazards and saving crucial lives. The effective management of shelters during emergencies is dependent on the existing institutional mechanism, local stakeholders and their understanding of the key functions of the emergency shelters. This paper reviews the key challenges through literature, reports and direct interviews of field professionals and practitioners. Findings: In normal times, cyclone shelters are used as schools and their management lies with the local communities and/or elected bodies. Some of the key emerging issues include: the convincing population at risk for evacuation with proper care, existing emergency shelters being repurposed as COVID-19 facilities, need for hygiene and safety material, special arrangement and segregation of population at higher risk of COVID-19 and large destruction of social infrastructures. Originality/value: During cascading disasters, adaptive governance becomes important. With the study of cyclones during the pandemic period, the paper draws key decision-making and governance points of cyclone shelter management. This case analysis can be useful to other similar situations during the prolonged pandemic time.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cascading risk; COVID-19; critical infrastructures; cyclone amphan; cyclone shelter management; early warning system; shelter management |
| Index terms: | emergency shelter, pandemic, cyclone, governance, rural area, critical infrastructure, early warning, interview, COVID-19, population, decision-making, methodology, practitioner |
| Subjects: | climate science, practitioner, data collection methods, construction type, business, financial risk, health risk and incident analysis, research methods, infrastructure and transport systems, land use and regional development, demography, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Governance, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here