Shuvo, S R S; Islam, M N and Islam, S T (2022) Role of information and communication technologies in build back better to post disaster recovery practices: Insights from Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 13(2), pp. 233-247. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to examine the role of information and communication technology (ICT)-based communication technologies to create a sustainable recovery strategy through Build Back Better practice in the existing policy framework of Bangladesh. Its purpose is to analyse the problems associated with the current recovery process of the country and how the ICT-based communication technology can improve the situation. Nevertheless, the aim also extends towards the limitation of the technology and the infrastructures and possible adjustments in this regard. Design/methodology/approach: To achieve the aim, the study conducted an extensive literature review of numerous grey literature, policy papers and scientific/academic articles in an exploratory approach. Findings: The result shows that the disaster recovery process of Bangladesh is slow, and there are some mismanagements (the lengthy risk assessment using ancient data generation processes, lack of accessibility and report-based data product) which was a cause behind the massive destruction done by recent cyclones. The ICT-based methods (proper database, many to many communications, GIS) can make this response faster, transparent and easy to access. Research limitations/implications: The research results may lack generalizability due to the research approach of the study. Thus, researchers are encouraged to test the proposed propositions further. Practical implications: The study includes some possible adjustments to the argument for the existing policy infrastructure and scope of communication technology to bridge the theory and practice. Social implications: The study also includes some suggestions to engage society in disaster recovery processes. Originality/value: This paper urges to study the implication of technology in terms of disaster recovery on a broad scale.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Bangladesh; build back better; disaster mitigation; disaster recovery; humanitarian assistance; ICT; ICT in disaster management; ICT in disaster recovery; natural disasters; policy; post disaster reconstruction; SFDRR; technology transfers |
| Index terms: | society, information and communication technology, natural disaster, strategy, literature review, disaster recovery, methodology, technology transfer, humanitarian, cyclone, recovery, accessibility, database, Bangladesh, post-disaster reconstruction, disaster mitigation, risk assessment, post-disaster recovery, disaster management |
| Subjects: | climate science, computing systems, operations management, principle, knowledge management, data analysis and analytics, management, research methods, inclusive design, post-disaster and reconstruction, Geography, financial risk, data management, emergency and crisis management, communities and social development, environmental hazards |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Ethics, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here