Ogunmakinde, O E; Egbelakin, T and Henderson, R (2023) Evaluation of animal safe places for emergency evacuation in the hunter region of New South Wales, Australia. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 14(4), pp. 553-576. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: This project aims to improve understanding of disaster preparedness and resilience, as well as animal recovery during a disaster event. The purpose of this study is to determine the type and extent of repair/renovation work required to bring proposed animal safe places and their different components up to the minimum standard for an operational animal evacuation site. Design/methodology/approach: On-site survey using a five-point Likert scale questionnaire was used to collect data through a five stage processes beginning with the creation of a facility register and continuing with the development of assessment guidelines, assessment planning, actual assessment and reporting. In the Hunter Region of New South Wales, Australia, 25 potential animal evacuation sites, including saleyards, showgrounds, animal shelters and racecourses, were identified and accessed. Findings: The findings of the study reveals that none of the facilities are of high standard. However, 16% would require cosmetic work, 76% would require minor work and the remaining facilities would require significant work. According to the characteristics of the facilities assessed, saleyards have a greater capacity to accommodate animals ranging in size from large to small. More than half of the facilities have average to excellent hay sheds and wash bays, whereas less than half have dedicated animal quarantine space. Research limitations/implications: The findings of this study should assist government agencies, local councils, emergency management teams and other stakeholders in planning for and considering renovation/upgrade of potential animal safe places. Originality/value: The assessment guideline developed as part of this research can be included in the local council’s emergency management plan to improve adequate planning for safe animal evacuation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | animals; Australia; disaster preparedness; disaster risk reduction; evacuation; safe places |
| Index terms: | renovation, emergency evacuation, Australia, recovery, disaster risk reduction, repair, New South Wales, emergency management, questionnaire, Likert scale, methodology, survey, government agency, disaster preparedness |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, operations management, research methods, maintenance engineering, safety engineering, renovation and retrofit, financial risk, Geography, health safety and environment, environmental hazards, administrative law |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here