Putri, I H S; Buchori, I and Handayani, W (2023) Land use change and precipitation implication to hydro-meteorological disasters in central java: An overview. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 14(1), pp. 100-114. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to prove that land-use change plays a role in the occurrence of hydro-meteorological disasters in Central Java, especially in relation to its upstream and downstream. Design/methodology/approach: The paper presents empirical findings from quantitative research using a spatial analysis and descriptive analysis. Findings: The upstream and downstream area of Central Java is categorized as a rapid development area that results in changes in land use and land cover. The findings showed that there was an increasing number of hydrometeorological disasters such as floods and landslides as the impact of land-use change and rainfall conditions. Research limitations/implications: Analysis of the relationship between rainfall and disaster events with more technical and specific analysis could be done in the further research. Originality/value: In this study, more analysis in the context of river basin systems including upstream and downstream in different periods to examine the linkage between them have been considered and incorporated.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | disaster; flooding; hydro-meteorological disaster; land-use change; landslides; precipitation |
| Index terms: | quantitative research, land cover, linkage, land, landslide, rainfall, land use, flooding, methodology, precipitation |
| Subjects: | climate science, business, data analysis and analytics, environmental science, real estate economics, research methods, environmental hazards |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here