Rezakhani, P (2023) Empirical study of housing recovery and property abandonment following valley fire in California: Insights from neighborhood characteristics and building attributes. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 14(5), pp. 628-639. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to examine how neighborhood characteristics (income, population composition) and individual building attributes (ownership) affect the recovery period of single-family housing and determine their correlations with property abandonment and changes in residential land use after natural disaster. Design/methodology/approach: This empirical study focuses on Valley Fire, one of the California’s most destructive wildfires in 2015, and uses assessor, community, demographic and sales data to measure recovery of a panel of single-family houses located in Lake County in California between 2012 and 2020. Several regression and correlation models will be developed to test different hypotheses. Findings: This study found that: Recovery period is longer than what expected in most existing literature; ownership status significantly affects recovery period; income level is not a significant factor for shortening the recovery period; and minorities may need more assistance for constant recovery. Findings of this research will help identify at risk communities to avoid uneven housing recovery and lower the rate of property abandonment. Originality/value: Housing recovery is key to revitalizing communities following major natural disasters. The sociodemographic characteristics of each neighborhood have significant impact on the duration of recovery and possible property abandonment. Understanding how home and neighborhood characteristics affect recovery will help planners prevent long-lasting adverse effects of natural disasters.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | disaster response; natural disasters; postconflict reconstruction; postdisaster reconstruction; rehabilitation; restoration |
| Index terms: | natural disaster, single-family housing, abandonment, land use, population, methodology, restoration, housing, reconstruction, recovery, disaster response, income, empirical study, planner, minority, ownership, duration |
| Subjects: | profession, construction type, economic analysis, operations management, real estate economics, research methods, economics, renovation and retrofit, environmental hazards, completion, building construction, emergency and crisis management, sociology, demography, project controls |
| Topics: | Time Control, Organizational Design, Urban Studies, Ethics, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here