Rokooei, S; Vahedifard, F and Belay, S (2023) Gender-based perception of civil engineering and construction students towards infrastructure and community resilience. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 14(1), pp. 40-52. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of gender differences in the perception of civil engineers and construction (CEC) students toward resilience to natural hazards and extreme events in a changing climate. This study also explores to what extent CEC students perceive the status of the US infrastructure systems similar to an external evaluation model (i.e. American Society of Civil Engineers Infrastructure Report Card). Design/methodology/approach: An empirical study was conducted to examine the perception of resilience among 103 females and 279 male CEC students from 15 universities across the USA. The obtained data were quantified, and different statistical methods were used to explore the similarities and differences in the gender group responses. Findings: The results indicated a significant mean difference (disagreement) between male and female groups in the importance of community resilience, management and handling of natural hazards. In addition, while there was no meaningful difference between female and male students in their content knowledge, female students showed a more accurate perception about impacting factors involved. Originality/value: The findings of this study offer new insight into the impacts of gender differences in the perception of resilience, which can be used to enhance the educational experience of CEC female students in areas related to community and infrastructure resilience.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | civil engineering students; community resilience; gender; infrastructure; natural hazards; perception; resilience |
| Index terms: | civil engineer, natural hazard, society, infrastructure resilience, methodology, community resilience, extreme event, statistical method, empirical study |
| Subjects: | environmental hazards, statistical analysis, communities and social development, research methods, social equity, profession, risk management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here