Vulnerability assessment of balikpapan (Indonesia) for climate change-induced urban flooding

Sukhwani, V and Shaw, R (2023) Vulnerability assessment of balikpapan (Indonesia) for climate change-induced urban flooding. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 14(3), pp. 387-401. ISSN 1759-5916

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the inter- and intra-relationships between climate change and urban flood risk in Balikpapan city. Design/methodology/approach: This study adopts a qualitative method by applying the driver–pressure–state–impact–response (DPSIR) framework, which helps to determine the strategies for reducing flood vulnerability in response to drivers, pressures, states and impacts. A secondary survey was conducted to understand the DPSIR. Findings: The key drivers are identified as the population growth, land-use change, climate change and urbanization. Secondary data show that population growth due to urbanization in Balikpapan city is very high, which means that there is a lot of demand for land in the city, and the city’s current responses are mostly focused on building flood control and prevention infrastructures like detention ponds, zero Q technology policies and green open space. The study reveals that the responses that have been implemented in Balikpapan are mostly ineffective problem-solving, which cannot reduce vulnerability to flooding for the long term. Originality/value: To the author’s knowledge, this is the first instance of the DPSIR framework being applied to Balikpapan city. It is, therefore, hoped that the study results will provide feasible directions to the city government for managing the future flood risks.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: balikpapan; climate change; DPSIR; flood disaster; urban flood; vulnerability
Index terms: climate change, population, methodology, vulnerability, flooding, strategy, survey, qualitative method, land, prevention, technology policy, open space, secondary data, urbanization, Indonesia
Subjects: financial risk, urban design, Geography, research methods, management, environmental hazards, demography, climate science, research design and methodology, data collection methods, strategic management, real estate economics, urban planning
Topics: Sustainability, Governance, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here