Bourgeois, E; Baril, P L; Normandin, J M and Therrien, M C (2024) Scoping review: Understanding the barriers and drivers of risk management in local governments. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 15(5), pp. 777-792. ISSN 1759-5908
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to provide scholars with a deep understanding of the field through the identification of strengths and weaknesses in the literature and support decision-makers in the development of new practices in local risk management based on scientific data. The specific question in this review asks: what are the drivers and barriers to local risk management? Design/methodology/approach: This paper provides an overview of the scientific literature produce over the past 20 years of the divers and barriers to local risk management. This paper presents a scoping review of peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2019 inclusively in the fields of public policy and public administration. Findings: This paper makes three main observations regarding the state of the literature. First, this paper finds that scholars mainly focus on single risk and certain regions of the world. Second, there is multiple approached used by the literature to study risk management at the local level. Third, little attention is given to the political context in which local risk management takes place. Originality/value: This paper is a complete literature review of more than 500 peer-reviewed articles published in academic journals regarding risk prevention policies over the past two decades. This paper analyzed the main findings of the current literature to provide a general view of the scholarship and improve the collective understanding of risk management at the local level by providing future research avenues. © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | anticipatory policies; governance; local governments; risk management |
| Index terms: | governance, risk management, prevention, local government, journal, literature review, methodology, public policy |
| Subjects: | administrative law, research methods, financial risk, public policy, data analysis and analytics, business, risk assessment, research dissemination and communication |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Governance, Risk Management, Research Practice, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here