Millett, S J; Dainty, A R J; Briscoe, G H and Neale, R H (2000) Towards an integrated construction supply network: Sub-contractors perspectives. In: Akintoye, A (ed.) Proceedings of 16th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6-8 September 2000, Glasgow, UK.
Abstract
Since the publication of the Egan report in 1998, there has been a strong emphasis on the need to integrate supply chains via partnering and strategic alliancing agreements throughout the construction industry. However, if the industry is to benefit from the performance enhancements that integrated supply networks promote, leading contractors must ensure that subcontractors buy into the supply chain management ethos, and work towards aligning their practices with the other partners involved. Historically, the relationships between main contractors and subcontractors have been adversarial. This raises questions as to whether true supply chain integration can take place. This paper presents the findings of research that examined the barriers to main contractors and subcontractors achieving total supply chain integration. By exploring subcontractor perspectives on supply chain management, and highlighting the fundamental issues which lead to mistrust and scepticism within supply chain relationships, the paper identifies a range of knowledge and attitudinal change requirements for improving the integration of these companies into the process in the future. It is suggested that main contractors must take the lead in promoting openness, trust and accountability if total supply chain integration is to be realised and change needs to be client driven to move any effect further down the chain.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | integration; sub-contractor; supply chain management |
| Index terms: | accountability, alliancing, partnering, main contractor, construction industry, subcontractor, agreements, supply chain integration, publication, integration, sub-contractor |
| Subjects: | liability law, industry analysis, partnership management, organizational analysis, supply chain integration, contractual arrangements, contract formation, practitioner, research dissemination and communication |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Information Management, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Supply Chain Management, Legal Issues, Contract Administration, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here