Meshkani, T (2024) Climate change and flooding: Governmental responses to displacement and relocation in Jakarta’s informal neighborhoods. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 15(4), pp. 551-570. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to analyze the policies and strategies used by governmental organizations to address the impacts of climate change in informal neighborhoods, kampungs, such as Bukit Duri and Melayu in Jakarta, Indonesia, focusing on canal and river flooding mitigation and infrastructure development. The research examines the displacement of residents due to the demolition of informal settlements along riverbanks, the role of different governmental organizations and the implications of these policies on affected communities. Design/methodology/approach: This study uses the theoretical framework of environmental injustice to evaluate the strategies used by the Indonesian Government to address climate change adaptation in Jakarta, with a specific focus on the problem of flooding and its impact on displacement. By analyzing the history and outcomes of flood mitigation policies, this paper assesses the government’s strategies related to infrastructure, evacuation and socialization. In doing so, the study examines the social impact of these policies on affected communities. Furthermore, social listening and media analysis of Twitter data and various news outlets are conducted to gain insights into the living conditions and experiences of displaced residents in two public housing projects. Findings: The study revealed the challenges faced by the government in implementing policies for climate change adaptation and flood mitigation in Jakarta, including a lack of community engagement with residents of the Kampungs in the decision-making process for relocation. Despite government efforts and providing low-cost apartments (rusuwana), the analysis sheds light on the various forms of injustice that result from the government’s approach to climate change adaptation in Jakarta. Originality/value: This study examines social justice issues in Jakarta’s informal neighborhoods and explores locally driven efforts vs government-mandated policies for managing natural hazards and adapting to climate change.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Batavia; Bukit Duri; ciliwung river; environmental justice; eviction; flood mitigation; infrastructure; Jakarta; kampung; kip; Melayu; planning policies; rusuwana; subsidence; social media |
| Index terms: | planning policy, social impact, informal settlement, media, social media, public housing, decision-making process, community engagement, adaptation, Indonesia, subsidence, living condition, history, climate change, eviction, methodology, flood mitigation, mitigation, social justice, flooding, strategy, infrastructure development, relocation, natural hazard, justice, canal, Jakarta |
| Subjects: | Geography, financial risk, infrastructure engineering, management, research methods, infrastructure and transport systems, liability law, environmental hazards, housing and residential development, market analysis, decision analysis, sociology, geotechnical engineering, community and social dimensions, climate science, construction type, user focus, technology adoption, legal systems, architectural and construction history, public policy |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Construction Technology, Governance, Sustainability, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Ethics |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here