Thakore, A Y; Iyer, M; Mishra, G and Doshi, S (2024) Resilient WASH development for urban poor: The case of Ahmedabad slums. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 15(1), pp. 19-44. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: Climate variability, accompanied by rapid urbanization and rising population disproportionality, impacts urban poor settlements. This paper aims to analyse the climate resilience for the urban poor in Ahmedabad through the lens of WASH development strategies. To assess the adaptive capacities of urban poor communities, a framework in the form of a vulnerability matrix has been used consisting of four key parameters – tenure, basic services, mobilization and partnership and disaster management capacities. The matrix implicitly recommends area-specific interventions to boost adaptive capacities and improve resilience based on WASH services. Design/methodology/approach: This paper was designed to assess the climate resilience of WASH services in the urban poor settlements of Ahmedabad city. In all, seven slums were selected using a stratified sampling approach considering topography, access to WASH services and urban heat island effect. These slums were then assessed using a theoretical framework having four key parameters – tenure, basic service, mobilization and partnership and disaster management capacities. The data for the analysis was collected from both secondary and primary sources. For the latter, semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders, observational field visits and focused group discussions with the communities were done. Findings: A ladder form of assessment matrix was derived from a thorough literature review and various pre-existing theories. This matrix consists of four key parameters – tenure, basic service, mobilization and partnership and disaster management capacities. The slums were evaluated by applying this framework, and direct and indirect relationships were established between the said parameters. Research limitations/implications: This paper was adapted in the light of various obstacles put forward by the Covid-19 pandemic. Some of the interviews with the bureaucrats and external researchers were conducted online, while the engagement with the slum dwellers was in-person, considering appropriate social and/or physical distancing norms. Implications of the Covid-19 second wave restricted the involvement of researchers with the communities at an ethnographic level. Originality/value: The ladder form of vulnerability assessment framework has been developed and contextualized using the insights from literature review, field visits and multi-stakeholder consultations. It was helpful in identifying aspects that require suitable interventions for improving and imparting resilience among the urban poor settlements. The learnings from this paper are significant for planners and decision-makers in identifying and prioritizing context-specific future projects for a city.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | climate change; climate resilience; ladder; resilience; slums; urban poor; vulnerability; wash |
| Index terms: | planner, urban heat island, sampling, disaster management, slum, variability, tenure, urbanization, pandemic, climate resilience, prioritizing, adaptive capacity, partnership, methodology, population, vulnerability, urban poor, norms, climate change, COVID-19, interview, strategy, literature review, topography |
| Subjects: | real estate economics, urban planning, data analysis and analytics, profession, data collection methods, climate science, community and social dimensions, sociology, decision analysis, demography, partnership management, statistical analysis, environmental hazards, research methods, physical geography and landforms, management, health risk and incident analysis, urban design, financial risk |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here