Wanninayake, S B; Nianthi, R and Dayarathne Banda, O G (2024) Roles and responsibilities of stakeholders involved in local-level flood risk management: A study in the Deduru Oya basin in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 15(4), pp. 680-698. ISSN 1759-5916
Abstract
Purpose: Disasters are occurring worldwide, and Sri Lanka has also become a victim of multiple disasters. Though there is a disaster management mechanism from the national level to the local level in Sri Lanka, several gaps are identified in pre- and postdisaster management activities. Among them, the responsibilities of local-level stakeholders in flood management activities are not performing at a satisfactory level. Therefore, the flood damage from the previous events was too great. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to assess the roles, responsibilities and performance of stakeholders involved in local-level flood risk management activities. Design/methodology/approach: The Deduru Oya basin in Sri Lanka was selected as the study area. The study hypothesized that "ineffective roles, responsibilities and performance of local level stakeholders have weakened the flood risk management in the Deduru Oya basin." The stratified random sampling method selected the sample (n = 425) from the flood-vulnerable population. Primary data were collected through a questionnaire survey, key informant interviews and field observations. Secondary data were collected from reports, work plans, journal papers and published maps. Descriptive data analysis methods and thematic data analysis methods were used in the study. Findings: About 69% of the respondents state that they are not satisfied with the involvement of government agencies in local-level flood risk management activities, while 10% of the respondents state that they are satisfied. The thematic analysis reveals several gaps, such as the lack of reservations in the Deduru Oya, improper land use practices, no inundation areas are identified and mapped out and the effects of illegal sand mining in the Deduru Oya. In addition to that, the lack of legal power vested in local governments in disaster management and the weaknesses of current legislation on flood risk management are the other major courses of local-level ineffectiveness. Research limitations/implications: The current research was limited to studying the involvement of local-level stakeholders in flood risk management, but the involvement of subnational and national-level stakeholders should be studied in future research. Originality/value: This paper examines the involvement of local-level stakeholders in flood risk management. The results of the study confirm that the roles and responsibilities of local-level stakeholders are not well-defined and mandated, and therefore, the performance of stakeholders involved is minimal. Therefore, the results highlight the need for a well-established community-based flood risk management mechanism.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | community-based flood management; deduru oya; flood; local-level stakeholders; river basin; Sri Lanka; questionaire survey; interview; field observation |
| Index terms: | disaster management, sand, mining, Sri Lanka, sampling, secondary data, methodology, population, thematic analysis, questionnaire, flood risk management, survey, journal, land use, local government, interview, legislation, community-based, data analysis, maps, government agency |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, legal systems, building materials, real estate economics, research dissemination and communication, data collection methods, administrative law, communities and social development, geotechnical engineering, demography, financial risk, methods and analysis, Geography, research methods, spatial and geospatial analysis |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Stakeholder Management, Legal Issues, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here