Haupt, T C and Smallwood, J (2003) HIV/AIDS in construction: Are older workers aware? Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 1(1), pp. 43-54. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
The New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD) (2001) urges African leaders to take responsibility for revitalizing and extending the provision of education, technical training and health services with high priority given to tackling HIV/AIDS, TB and other communicable diseases. The International Labor Organization (ILO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) both agree that occupational health and safety in Africa needs strengthening. In support of this realization are the need to maintain and promote workers' health and working capacity. The fight against HIV/AIDS in the workplace is a continental priority. In the absence of any other definitive or similar study, this study aims to establish a valid baseline assessment of the levels of knowledge, types of attitudes, perceptions and beliefs of older construction workers in South Africa regarding HIV infection and AIDS. This paper reports only on findings concerning the level of knowledge and awareness of HIV/AIDS among older construction workers as determined during the first phase of an exploratory study commenced in August 2002. Older construction workers generally had acceptable levels of correct knowledge, perceptions and attitudes on most issues relative to the disease. However, their employers had not played a major contributory role. The study highlighted several areas where older workers either had incorrect and deficient knowledge and attitudes or demonstrated high levels of uncertainty.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | HIV/AIDS; older workers; productivity; attitude; behaviour; training costs |
| Index terms: | construction worker, productivity, partnership, Africa, health service, South Africa, HIV/AIDS, strengthening, occupational health and safety, exploratory study |
| Subjects: | public and environmental health, research methods, structural engineering, management, Geography, health conditions and diseases, occupational health and safety management, partnership management, practitioner, regions and continents |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here