Shakantu, W; Tookey, J E and Bowen, P A (2003) The hidden cost of transportation of construction materials: An overview. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 1(1), pp. 103-118. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Construction is possibly one of the most cost orientated industries in any economy. The primary mode of supplier selection has always tended to be on the basis of lowest material or service cost at point of consumption. Indeed, this remains the case even in the post‐Latham (1994) and Egan (1998) world in which we live. In general, construction cost estimates are based on a straight ‘take off’ of the quantities required. All further ‘other’ costs in the form of overhead, profit, labour and wastage are consolidated into the cost of the materials. Construction is unique within the various industries making up a modern economy in that the bulk of the materials and components that it uses are of relatively low value while being of high volume. Consequently, a significant proportion of the ‘other’ costs associated with materials purchases must be in the form of transportation from the point of extraction and / or production to the point of consumption. This paper provides an overview of the hidden costs associated with the transportation of construction materials within the industry and proposes improved methods of managing the logistics of the construction process e.g. reverse logistics, in order to reduce costs and increase the basic sustainability of the construction process.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | logistics; reverse logistics; sustainability; profitability; optimisation |
| Index terms: | take-off, Latham, profit, consumption, reverse logistics, construction cost, estimate, construction process, construction material, profitability |
| Subjects: | building construction, consumer economics, supply chain operations, industry policy reports, financial and cost management, quantity surveying, building materials, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Governance, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Site Management, Supply Chain Management, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here