Building features and site-specific factors affecting buildability in Hong Kong

Lam, P T I; Wong, F K W and Wong, F W H (2007) Building features and site-specific factors affecting buildability in Hong Kong. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 5(2), pp. 129-147. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: Buildability is concerned with enhancing building designs to achieve ease of construction. Adapting from the Buildable Design Appraisal System in Singapore, a tailored-made Buildability Assessment Model (BAM), which scores buildability of building designs, has been devised for use in Hong Kong. In developing the BAM, local factors and terrain characteristics, e.g. highly constrained and sloping site conditions, which are common features besetting the industry, are particularly considered. The purpose of this paper, therefore, is to report on the effects of building sites on buildability. Design/methodology/approach: A questionnaire survey with 39 valid responses was administered on construction practitioners, aimed at understanding the relative buildability importance of a number of building features and site-specific factors in Hong Kong. Analysis was carried out using the relative importance index method. Findings: It is found that the most important buildability considerations for building features and site-specific factors are "simplicity" and "allowing working space for safe construction and minimising water ingress and geotechnical difficulties", respectively. Research limitations/implications: The small sample size, though statistically significant, can be increased in further studies of similar type, to enhance the representativeness of the rankings. Originality/value: The survey findings are valuable in that they offer a practical reference for design professionals, by scoring their designs, to comprehend the degree to which various building features and site-specific factors impact on the ease of constructing their designs.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: buildings; design; Hong Kong
Index terms: building design, Hong Kong, Singapore, sample size, buildability, building site, relative importance index, construction practitioner, survey, methodology, questionnaire, appraisal
Subjects: data collection methods, risk assessment, research design and methodology, architectural design, factor and component analysis, research methods, Geography, professional development, site and location studies, design efficiency
Topics: Information Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Risk Management, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here