Factors influencing water consumption in South African schools

Oliver, N N and Brümmer, D G (2007) Factors influencing water consumption in South African schools. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 5(1), pp. 81-94. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: Schools throughout South Africa, as with many other institutional facilities, are becoming increasingly pressured to reduce operating costs. Utility costs are often overlooked as opportunities to reduce school operating costs. Whilst environmental management is the responsibility of every school governing body, and should be addressed in a holistic and responsible manner, the reduction of water consumption may provide not only environmental benefits, but also cost savings to the institution. The purpose of this study, whilst reinforcing the need for water use management within schools, is to provide a structured approach to identify opportunities for water use reduction within these facilities. Design/methodology/approach: Practical interventions, available to school management, are illustrated relating water conservation to cost savings and the preservation of water as a scarce national resource, assisting non-technical school managers to identify possible applications. Findings: Water conservation in the form of reduced consumption will have varied impacts. These include environmental benefits and direct and indirect cost savings. Originality/value: The paper offers recommendations regarding the installation of pressure reducing devices, water strainers, and non-return equipment, use of irrigation of sports fields and gardens, and regular and consistent monitoring.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: consumption; schools; South Africa; sustainable development; water
Index terms: cost saving, water conservation, water consumption, monitoring, sustainable development, becoming, operating cost, consumption, environmental management, manager, South Africa, methodology, savings, indirect cost
Subjects: sustainability assessment, cost management, philosophical process, practitioner, economic analysis, Geography, research methods, economics, occupational health, control systems, consumer economics, health safety and environment, environmental resource management
Topics: Site Management, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Cost Management, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here