Tam, V W Y; Tam, C M and Ng, W C Y (2007) On prefabrication implementation for different project types and procurement methods in Hong Kong. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 5(1), pp. 68-80. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: The use of prefabrication has been considered as one of the most effective waste minimization methods in the construction context; however, the industry has found difficulties to implement it. Contractors lack experience in using prefabrication and they do not know how to implement prefabrication to their projects effectively. The purpose of this paper is to present the findings of a study on the implementation of prefabrication in the context of different project types and procurement approaches. Design/methodology/approach: This paper examines possible project types and procurement methods to maximally gain benefits of using prefabricated building components. A questionnaire survey and structured interviews have been conducted. Findings: From the results, it should be noted that residential projects and design and build procurement methods are the most effective project types and procurement methods, respectively, in using prefabrication. In the interview discussion, one of the governmental employees highlighted that about 65 percent of projects are residential projects. The high supply of residential housing suits fast population growth in Hong Kong. The interviewee also explained that shortening construction period is one of the main goals in their projects. Furthermore, an interviewed main contractor highlighted that the involvement of contractors at the early design stage in a project can bring advantages in considering construction methods before project commencement on site and to improve project constructability. An interviewed subcontractor also explained that the involvement of construction organizations in the design stage can effectively improve the use of prefabrication in major activities including concreting, plastering and formworking, rather than wet-trade construction activities. Therefore, the use of standardized designs and prefabricated building components are highly encouraged. Originality/value: This brings early considerations and suggestions to project parties to improve prefabrication implementation. The effects of prefabrication implementation are also considered.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Hong Kong; procurement; waste |
| Index terms: | construction activity, procurement method, Hong Kong, main contractor, construction organization, early design stage, implementation, prefabrication, constructability, prefabricated building, construction method, residential housing, survey, project party, minimization, interview, design and build, subcontractor, design stage, questionnaire, residential project, methodology, population, concreting |
| Subjects: | Geography, design process, economic development, construction integration, algorithms, research methods, demography, building construction, sociology, practitioner, data collection methods, construction type, organization, professional practice, construction operations, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Site Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Procurement, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here