Improving construction planning through 4D planning

Allen, C and Smallwood, J (2008) Improving construction planning through 4D planning. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 6(1), pp. 7-20. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose Construction planning will play an increasingly more critical role within the realm of the built environment due to the unprecedented growth in the industry and a general skills shortage. Existing practices are failing to deliver the desired results for construction companies and clients alike. The increasing availability of 3D models has facilitated their use in a process known as 4D planning, allowing the visual planning of activities including the communication of logistical and other interfaces. The purpose of the research was to better understand the implementation of such a process, and determine the benefits thereof. Design/methodology/approach A survey of the literature was followed by an observation/participation case study. A further survey of construction personnel was conducted to provide data to inform opinions generated during the case study. Findings The results of the research suggest that 4D planning provides the tools for visualising the process implications in creating 3D reality whilst facilitating the improved coordination, communication and delivery of a project to programme. Research limitations/implications The findings of the study emanate from a single project environment, namely a case study, and therefore further research should be undertaken to substantiate and validate the findings. Originality/value The findings have major implications in that the benefits of the use of 4D planning have been documented. Consequently, clients need to mandate the use of 3D in the design phase, to enable design phase information to be used downstream for planning, off-site pre-fabrication and facilities management. Contractors need to use 4D models to evaluate their critical activities, maximise the use of labour and materials, and communicate the site-based planning process.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: communication; construction works; modelling; physical planning
Index terms: programme, survey, construction company, construction personnel, 4D planning, mandate, facilities management, methodology, 3D model, case study, planning process, fabrication, coordination, construction planning, implementation, modelling, construction work, design phase, built environment
Subjects: organization, computational design, data collection methods, workforce, operations management, visualization, analytical methods, construction planning, professional practice, contractual arrangements, research methods, manufacturing engineering, management, project controls, political science, infrastructure and transport systems
Topics: Time Control, Organizational Design, Site Management, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Governance, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here