Edwards, D J and Holt, G D (2008) Construction workers' health and safety knowledge: Initial observations on some test-result data. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 6(1), pp. 65-80. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: Numerous factors relate to the effectiveness of health and safety (H&S) management within construction; but a specific factor influencing the extent of H&S "incidents" on site, is the amount of H&S knowledge held by construction workers. This paper aims to offer some initial observations on construction workers' H&S knowledge, based upon test-result data from an invigilated online H&S test. Design/methodology/approach: Data from 564 candidates were analysed principally by observing mean performance scores and apparent differences, among the sample and defined sub-samples, for each of five H&S subject groupings that make up the test. Findings: Mean scores indicate better retained knowledge in "general H&S" questions and lower knowledge in "manual handling" questions. There was little difference in mean scores between defined candidate age groups; or between different size classifications of candidates' employer organisations. Perceived characteristics of employers' training regimes did not appear to impact test results either. Research limitations/implications: Disparity among sub-sample sizes within the data means that these findings are indicative and accordingly, have implications for a follow-on study that will utilise deterministic modelling to more definitively confirm the effect of formal training and other (e.g. workplace) characteristics, on worker H&S knowledge retention. Originality/value: The paper shows that workers having recently undertaken H&S training exhibit greatest retained knowledge, the level of which remains relatively consistent regardless of where a candidate lives, or a candidate's age group.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | employees; health and safety |
| Index terms: | modelling, disparity, construction worker, effectiveness, sample size, retention, impact test, methodology, health and safety |
| Subjects: | analytical methods, research design and methodology, reliability engineering, practitioner, social justice, research methods, performance management, management, health safety and environment |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Human Resources, Ethics, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here