Vinodh, S; Sundararaj, G; Devadasan, S R and Rajanayagam, D (2008) Quantification of agility: An experimentation in an Indian electronics switches manufacturing company. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 6(1), pp. 48-64. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to design a tool for quantifying agility in organisations and test its practical compatibility. Design/methodology/approach: An agile quantification tool was designed initially by referring to a 20 criteria agile model. A scoring pattern with a maximum 1,000 marks was incorporated in the agile quantification tool which was then subjected to experimentation in an Indian electronics switches manufacturing company. Findings: A feedback session was conducted among the executives of the company to test the practical acceptability of the agile quantification tool. A statistical analysis of the study revealed that 90 per cent of their views were in favour of adopting it. Research limitations/implications: The marks allotted against the 20 agile criteria incorporated in the agile quantification tool are not supported with research findings. This leads to the questioning of the rationale behind allotting the marks against these criteria. In order to overcome this limitation, the opinions of the executives were gathered. Their opinions revealed that the marks allotment followed in the agile quantification tool is practically compatible. Practical implications: In order to acquire agile characteristics, modern organisations should measure the agility levels at which they operate. This agile quantification tool explained in this paper fulfils this need. Originality/value: The agile quantification tool presented in this paper rests its foundation on the 20 criteria agile model which is well supported by the research findings reported in literature. By the virtue of its research background and practical compatibility, the agile quantification tool is considered to be highly valuable.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | agile production; organizational structures; performance measurement; quality; switchgear |
| Index terms: | methodology, switchgear, experiment, organizational structure, executive, statistical analysis, quantification, performance measurement |
| Subjects: | electrical systems, data science, practitioner, data collection methods, measurement and scaling, sociology, research methods, performance measurement |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here