Effects of grain size on mechanical properties of nanostructured copper alloy by severe plastic deformation (SPD) process

Sanusi, K O and Oliver, G J (2009) Effects of grain size on mechanical properties of nanostructured copper alloy by severe plastic deformation (SPD) process. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 7(3), pp. 335-341. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: Severe plastic deformation (SPD) has provided new opportunities in investigations of enhanced mechanical properties like high strength and ductility by permitting grain refinement to a nanometer level, especially ultra-fine grained and nanocrystalline metals and alloys. These materials have been attracting more and more research interest during the past few decades due to scientific curiosity and their engineering potentials with a significant advancement in their understanding. The purpose of this paper is to find the relationship between processing, structures and properties of these novel materials with the ultimate goal of producing a model to account for the grain size changes at the nano-scale. Design/methodology/approach: In this paper, specimens with various grain sizes from 23 to 80 μm are obtained via processing by SPD, using equal channel angular press (ECAP) technique. The effect of grain size on the hardness properties of nanostructured copper alloy has been investigated using micro-hardness testing of the samples to test the mechanical properties of this material. Findings: The results reveal that the copper alloys processed by SPD using ECAP technique after various passes differ in the grain size and mechanical properties. The hardness test exhibits grained size dependence according to Hall-Petch relationship from room temperature. The increase in the hardness with number of passages suggest increasing in strain during deformation, as the passes increase the smaller grain size can be produced. Originality/value: The paper usefully shows how nanostructured materials by SPD technique will offer a possible solution to the problem of using light metals for certain applications by increasing the strength of materials which could be used in structures where previously strength requirement in various industries, including such as, for example, transportation, medical devices and electronics. Understanding the relationship between processing, structures and properties will enhance the performance of metals and alloys in a target application which is important in improving the mechanical properties of engineering materials that are necessary fundamental for applications of lightweight materials and structures. The influences of structural parameters, such as grain size, grain shape on plastic deformation which is important parameters in study the mechanical properties of nanostructured materials.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: alloys; deformation; materials management; mechanical properties of materials; nanotechnology; plastic analysis
Index terms: materials management, deformation, room temperature, methodology, strength of materials, mechanical property, ductility, metal, testing, investigation, copper, lightweight material, plastic
Subjects: traditional and composite building materials, research methods, material properties and characteristics, material science and engineering, building performance, data collection methods, materials science, operations management, professional practice
Topics: Design Practice, Site Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here