Sihabuddin, S S and Ariaratnam, S T (2009) Methodology for estimating emissions in underground utility construction operations. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 7(1), pp. 37-64. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: Today, engineers are faced with engaging the construction option that not only provides the best cost advantage, but also considers environmental sensitivities to create the most sustainable solution. The purpose of this paper is to identify a methodology to determine the pollutant emissions from utility construction methods. Design/methodology/approach: A survey of the literature was conducted to determine the need and developments in the area of emissions from construction industry. With the use of approved methodologies, an application program that is simple and user friendly was designed to estimate emissions from utility construction projects. Findings: The results of the research shows that the emissions can be calculated from standard equations using details available at any project site. With minimum effort, construction industry personnel can use available historical project data to determine and quantify emissions from their construction activities. Research limitations/implications: The research examines the major air pollutants from equipment/trucks burning diesel fuel. The impact of existing climatic conditions, weather and maintenance of machineries is not considered in the emission calculations. Practical implications: Estimation of emissions during the design phase of a project will help regulators and decision makers choose a construction methodology that not only incorporates time, cost, and social benefits, but also environmental benefits. Originality/value: Utilization of the tool created by this research should make contractors conscious towards the impact of their activities on their environment by showing them a methodology for estimating such emissions. The research shows the path to promulgate their methodologies in a world that is going "Green".
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction operations; pollutants; sustainable development; United States of America |
| Index terms: | personnel, social benefit, sustainable development, project data, survey, construction method, methodology, program, construction project, pollutant, estimating, weather, climatic condition, United States of America, construction activity, engineer, construction operation, regulator, estimation, design phase, diesel fuel, construction industry, estimate, option |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, professional practice, energy systems, construction operations, climate science, air quality, data collection methods, profession, environmental health, industry analysis, building construction, sociology, decision analysis, production management, Geography, health safety and environment, software systems, research methods, management, theoretical framing |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Site Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here