Performance comparison of carbon nanotube, nickel silicide nanowire and copper vlsi interconnects: Perspectives and challenges ahead

Duksh, Y S; Kaushik, B K; Sarkar, S and Singh, R (2010) Performance comparison of carbon nanotube, nickel silicide nanowire and copper vlsi interconnects: Perspectives and challenges ahead. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 8(3), pp. 334-353. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore and evaluate the performance comparison of carbon nanotubes (CNT) and nickel silicide (NiSi) nanowires interconnects as prospective alternatives to copper wire interconnects. Design/methodology/approach: The increasing resistivity of the copper wire with scaling and rising demands on current density drives the need for identifying new wiring solutions. This paper explores the various alternatives to copper. The metallic bundle CNTs and NiSi nanowires are promising candidates that can potentially address the challenges faced by copper. This paper analyzes various electrical models of carbon nanotube and recently introduced novel interconnect solution using NiSi nanowires. Findings: The theoretical studies proves CNTs and NiSi nanowires to be better alternatives against copper on the ground of performance parameters, such as effective current density, delay and power consumption. NiSi nanowire provides highest propagation speed for short wire length, and copper is the best for intermediate wire length, while bundle CNTs is faster for long wire length. NiSi nanowire has lowest power consumption than copper and CNTs. Originality/value: This paper investigates, assess and compares the performance of carbon nanotubes (CNT) and NiSi nanowires interconnects as prospective alternatives to copper wire interconnects in future VLSI chips.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: carbon; circuits; copper; nanotechnology
Index terms: methodology, carbon nanotube, scaling, power consumption, propagation, copper, density
Subjects: traditional and composite building materials, specialized materials and systems, research methods, energy systems, analytical methods, organization, engineering process
Topics: Urban Studies, Sustainability, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here