Analysis of significant factors in DWDM optical communication systems

Kaur, G; Singh, M L and Patterh, M S (2010) Analysis of significant factors in DWDM optical communication systems. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 8(1), pp. 28-44. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: The current generation of light wave systems benefit from increased transmission distance by using optical amplification and increased capacity by using dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) technology. The reach of present systems is limited by the noise contributed by the used amplifiers, combined with nonlinear effects from transmission. This paper aims to address these issues. Design/methodology/approach: The nature and extent of degradations in the optical DWDM systems due to these limiting factors have been discussed in this paper. Findings: It has been learnt that stimulated Raman scattering (SRS), four wave mixing (FWM) and amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) are the important factors in optical DWDM systems. These factors limit the system capacity of the transmission systems drastically. Originality/value: It can be concluded from the discussion that while designing an efficient DWDM system, an optimization of the channel separation and the amplifier separation is required to minimize the nonlinear effects (FWM and SRS) along with the ASE noise introduced by inline optical amplifications.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: design and development; electronic engineering; optical communication equipment; optimization techniques
Index terms: methodology, design and development, optimization technique, degradation
Subjects: material degradation and durability, design process, algorithms, research methods
Topics: Digital Applications, Design Practice, Construction Materials, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here