Today's pupils, tomorrow's engineers! Pedagogy and policy: A UK perspective

Clark, R (2011) Today's pupils, tomorrow's engineers! Pedagogy and policy: A UK perspective. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 9(2), pp. 227-241. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to provide a critical analysis of UK Government policy in respect of recent moves to attract young people into engineering. Drawing together UK and EU policy literature, the paper considers why young people fail to look at engineering positively. Design/methodology/approach: Drawing together UK policy, practitioner and academic-related literature the paper critically considers the various factors influencing young people's decision-making processes in respect of entering the engineering profession. A conceptual framework providing a diagrammatic representation of the "push" and "pull" factors impacting young people at pre-university level is given. Findings: The discussion argues that higher education in general has a responsibility to assist young people overcome negative stereotypical views in respect of engineering education. Universities are in the business of building human capability ethically and sustainably. As such they hold a duty of care towards the next generation. From an engineering education perspective, the major challenge is to present a relevant and sustainable learning experience that will equip students with the necessary skills and competencies for a lifelong career in engineering. This may be achieved by promoting transferable skills and competencies or by the introduction of a capabilities-driven curriculum which brings together generic and engineering skills and abilities. Social implications: In identifying the push/pull factors impacting young people's decisions to study engineering, this paper considers why, at a time of global recession, young people should select to study the required subjects of mathematics, science and technology necessary to study for a degree in engineering. The paper identifies the long-term social benefits of increasing the number of young people studying engineering. Originality/value: In bringing together pedagogy and policy within an engineering framework, the paper adds to current debates in engineering education providing a distinctive look at what seems to be a recurring problem - the failure to attract young people into engineering.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: educational policy; engineering education; Generation Y; pedagogy; youth
Index terms: pedagogy, government policy, profession, learning experience, recession, decision-making process, engineer, pupil, engineering education, higher education, methodology, career, practitioner, conceptual framework, duty, social benefit, science, drawing
Subjects: educational institutions, decision analysis, sociology, professional education, theoretical framing, research methods, teaching methods, professional development, technical documentation, public policy, economic analysis, contractual role, profession, specialized education, institututions, practitioner, learning methods
Topics: Governance, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Education, Contract Administration, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here