Othman, A and Abdellatif, M (2011) Partnership for integrating the corporate social responsibility of project stakeholders towards affordable housing development: A South African perspective. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 9(3), pp. 273-295. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the role of partnership in integrating the corporate social responsibility (CSR) of project stakeholders towards better housing affordability. Design/methodology/approach: A research methodology, consisted of literature review and field studies, is designed to accomplish four objectives. First, to provide a comprehensive literature review of the concepts of affordable housing, project stakeholders, CSR and partnership; second, to present and synthesis the results of relevant field studies examined the experiences of CSR and partnership among selected construction firms and the Government of South Africa (SA) in affordable housing projects; third, to develop a CSR-partnership model (and its action plan) that integrates the CSR of project stakeholders to achieve greater housing affordability; finally, to draw some conclusions and recommendations to improve the practice of CSR and partnership among government authorities and construction professionals. Findings: Affordable housing is one of the greatest challenges that face countries around the globe, especially developing countries. The complexity of the problem hinders governments, alone, from achieving their plans for sustainable development. Project stakeholders must have social responsibilities towards supporting government initiatives for affordable housing development. The five-domain CSR-partnership model developed by the authors will help integrating the CSR of project stakeholders as an approach for developing affordable housing project. Research limitations/implications: Because of the conceptual nature of the proposed model, it has to be tested and validated to ensure its capability to integrate the CSR of project stakeholders as an innovative approach for overcoming the difficulties facing governments in providing housing for the poor. Originality/value: The conducted review provides better understanding of the issue related to the practice of social responsibilities and partnership of project stakeholders, both worldwide and in SA. Through its five domains (government, society, economy, law, and technology), the proposed CSR-partnership model and its action plan are expected to serve as a foundation for optimising the partnership of project stakeholders with government authorities towards better housing affordability. This ideology has received scant attention in construction literature. The developed model represents a synthesis that is novel and creative in thought and adds value to the knowledge in a manner that has not previously occurred.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | affordable housing; corporate social responsibility; housing; partnership; project stakeholders; South Africa |
| Index terms: | society, field study, developing country, construction firm, government initiatives, sustainable development, housing affordability, face, literature review, project stakeholder, methodology, complexity, housing, social responsibility, South Africa, partnership, research methodology, construction professional, affordable housing, corporate social responsibility |
| Subjects: | communities and social development, industry analysis, systems engineering, political science, partnership management, sociology, health safety and environment, Geography, professional development, development economics, research methods, data analysis and analytics, psychology, construction type, research design and methodology, organization |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, International Construction, Construction Technology, Governance, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here