Badu, E; Edwards, D J and Owusu-Manu, D (2012) Trade credit and supply chain delivery in the Ghanaian construction industry: Analysis of vendor interactions with small to medium enterprises. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 10(3), pp. 360-379. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: Trade credit is treated as a financial intermediation device whereby construction vendors act as financial providers to their customers through deferred payments of goods purchased. The purpose of this paper is to investigate and report upon the key factors and motives influencing vendors' decision on trade credit provision to small to medium sized construction firms. Design/methodology/approach: Adopting deductive methodological approach, this paper utilises a combination of primary data emanating from structured survey questionnaires supplemented by secondary source of data from an extensive literature review, to present insightful commentary about trade credit provision in Ghana. The structured survey questionnaire was administered to 100 construction vendor firms/suppliers to elicit relevant data about their trade credit intentions. Drawing upon the principles of a total design method (TDM) of survey, a relatively high response rate of 57 percent was achieved. Principal component (factor) analysis was adopted to obtain simplification of variables and to detect underlying dimensions and reveal potential complex structures within decision variables. Findings: The underlying constructs and motives of vendors on trade credit were intricately interwoven in two principal factors: risk distribution and liquidity; and sustaining business relationship and liquidity. Despite the uncharacteristic manifestation of the liquidity measure being associated with the two principal components, the findings demonstrate the relative importance of liquidity in the trade credit debate. A critical observation stemming from the analysis was that trade policy was absent within the trade credit market in Ghana; this poses a potential threat to trade credit exchange and its development. Originality/value: The paper's methodological approach is uniquely positioned between the conceptual and empirical interface and the overarching research is pioneering within the developing world nation of Ghana. The paper's findings will be useful to contractors, particularly, small and medium size contractors who are considering feasible finance options; and vendors who seek to consolidate their clientele base.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | credit; factor analysis; financial institutions; Ghana; small to medium-sized enterprises; supply chain management; trade credit; vendors |
| Index terms: | motive, factor analysis, simplification, liquidity, questionnaire, dimension, business relationship, design method, construction firm, interaction, survey, literature review, Ghana, methodology, relative importance, construction industry, option, financial intermediation, drawing |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, strategic management, industry analysis, technical documentation, decision analysis, research methods, economic analysis, Geography, statistical analysis, health monitoring assessment and metrics, psychology, risk assessment, management, organization, data collection methods, behavioral psychology, design methods |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Human Resources, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Design Practice, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here