Styhre, A; Wikmalm, L; Ollila, S and Roth, J (2012) Sociomaterial practices in engineering work: The backtalk of materials and the tinkering of resources. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 10(2), pp. 151-167. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Engineering work is a specific form of sociomaterial practice, drawing on and combining social and material resources to accomplish desirable effects, often combining technological and social resources. A study of an electrical engineering development project suggests that the work unfolds as a process whereby technological artefacts are verified on the basis of testing procedures and whereby events concerning technological failure, what has been called the “back-talk” of technology, are handled using joint problem-solving. The purpose of this paper is to report on a study of a new product development project at a multinational telecommunications company. An ethnographic case study of a new product development project at a major multinational telecommunications company was undertaken. Engineering work is based on distributed know-how and joint collaborations, emerging as a patchwork of activities where one single person may know a lot, but not everything, about the technology-in-the-making. The paper concludes that joint concern for the technology, manifested as its gradual advancement, is what serves as the glue holding the community of engineers together. The paper presents an original study of the work of a team of electrical engineers and inquires into how engineers combine technical and social resources when attempting to make the technology work.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | electrical engineering; engineering; innovation; innovation work; materials; resources; sociomaterial practice |
| Index terms: | sociomaterial practice, case study, electrical engineer, engineer, new product development, electrical engineering, testing, drawing, collaboration, telecommunication, artefact |
| Subjects: | innovation studies, profession, data collection methods, professional practice, communication, technical documentation, management, civil engineering, collaborative management, sociology |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Design Practice, Supply Chain Management, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here