Gudem, M; Steinert, M; Welo, T and Leifer, L (2013) Redefining customer value in lean product development design projects. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 11(1), pp. 71-89. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this paper is to suggest a redefinition of the functional product value calculation in lean product development (LPD). The proposed method integrates emotional customer value into the traditional model, which is based on minimizing operating costs and reducing time-to-market. Design/methodology/approach: Perceptions of customer value among employees at a Norwegian boat manufacturer, customers, and competitors are investigated through a case study. Results are compared with principles for promoting value and minimizing waste in LPD. Findings: Findings from the case study suggest that a less-than-perfect match between customer needs and product offerings sometimes improves customer satisfaction. Furthermore, how customers perceive product value depends on experience that may be at variance with current needs. It is also suggested that deep understanding of customer-defined value does not imply an ability to satisfy that value. Research limitations/implications: Understanding the position of meaning-driven and technology-driven innovation in different types of industries represents a challenge for further research, as does the issue of whether these two are the only dimensions driving a sustainable innovation strategy. Actionable knowledge on how emotional value can be maximized is also needed. Originality/value: Maximizing customer value is a core principle in LPD, but the value definitions used tend to be based on logical reasoning rather than real-life observations. This article presents empirical insights concerning different stakeholders' perceptions of customer value, and the resulting implications for the present lean framework.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | case study; customer value; design; employees attitudes; implementing; innovation; lean product development; managing and practicing innovation; mechanical engineering; Norway; product design |
| Index terms: | dimension, innovation strategy, mechanical engineering, operating cost, customer satisfaction, variance, case study, product development, practicing innovation, methodology, meaning, Norway, manufacturer, reasoning, product design |
| Subjects: | innovation and technology management, health monitoring assessment and metrics, economic analysis, data collection methods, business, mechanical systems, innovation studies, practitioner, cognitive psychology, sociology, measurement and scaling, research methods, service delivery, Geography |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here