The production of social space: Shopping malls as relational and transductive spaces

Hagberg, J and Styhre, A (2013) The production of social space: Shopping malls as relational and transductive spaces. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 11(3), pp. 354-374. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: The concept of space is commonly transcending the binary separation between materiality and abstraction structuring social theory, being both a built, immutable environment and what is derived from uncoordinated spatial practices embedded in social norms and instituted behaviours. As a consequence, organization theorists have been only marginally interested in organized spaces and spatiality, examining primarily office spaces and other visual, symbolic spaces in organizations. Organized space is relational and transductive, constructed to be able to both accommodate various needs and demands and to be able of responding to emerging information. Organized space is thus transient and fluid, only temporarily stabilized, and fundamentally open to external influences. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: A study of shopping center development practices demonstrates how various actors representing heterogeneous interests collaborate to balance various interests such as the need for both commercial and public spaces in a community, rendering social space a politicized space wherein disputes and interests are settled. Findings: Social spaces such as shopping centers are unfolding as relational and transductive spaces capable of being modified and changes as new social needs and demands emerge. Shopping center spaces are developed in the intersection of a variety of professional domains of expertise and social interests and needs. Originality/value: The paper combines a theoretical framework of social spaces as being what is produced in collaborative efforts and what includes both technical and material as well as social and cultural components with an empirical study of shopping mall development.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction innovation; design; implementing; managing and practicing innovation
Index terms: dispute, shopping centre, office space, social theory, empirical study, social norms, materiality, practicing innovation, construction innovation, public space, methodology
Subjects: research methods, urban design and public space, social theory, building construction, social justice, sociology, construction type, innovation studies, dispute resolution
Topics: Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Ethics, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here