Lichtenstein, S; Badu, E; Owusu-Manu, D G; Edwards, D J and Holt, G D (2013) Corporate social responsibility architecture and project alignments: A study of the Ghanaian construction industry. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 11(3), pp. 334-353. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: The developed world increasingly expects corporations to support the community under the corporate social responsibility (CSR) banner. For developing countries, the situation differs and CSR has yet to be fully embraced. This study aims to examine the CSR in the Ghanaian construction industry (GCI). Design/methodology/approach: A multi-stage methodology employs descriptive statistics, the t-test and χ2-test to analyse survey data. Findings: Results highlight three broad classifications of CSR project typology: social; infrastructure; and environmental. Ghanaian firms are found more aligned to social/intangible CSR projects than tangible ones. Research limitations/implications: The study is geographically focussed, but the findings hold relevance to all the developing countries. The findings hold implications for policy making and planning in terms of how Ghanaian communities might integrate corporations within their geographical catchments, to enhance sustainable, local development. Originality/value: This is the first in a series of CSR research within the Ghanaian context. It holds value for others conducting similar work within the developing world.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | corporate social responsibility; sustainable construction |
| Index terms: | policy making, sustainable construction, developing country, survey, methodology, local development, statistics, corporate social responsibility, construction industry |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, research methods, sustainable construction, urban design, development economics, health safety and environment, policy studies, mathematical modelling, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, International Construction, Sustainability, Governance, Health and Safety, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here