BIM collaboration in student architectural technologist learning

Mathews, M (2013) BIM collaboration in student architectural technologist learning. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 11(2), pp. 190-206. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: This paper is the result of a qualitative case study which investigated the influence of building information modelling (BIM) collaboration on the learning of student architectural technologists based on a studio group project. The purpose of this paper is to disseminate knowledge gained into a new learning environment facilitated by the collaborative properties of a BIM application. Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative case study approach has been used to undertake the examination of the learners' experiences during the project. This approach allowed the author to map the complex interaction between the participants during the stages of the collaborative design project. Findings: This paper provides evidence of a new learning environment created in the studio setting. This learning is facilitated by the creation of a single digital building model by a student group and then worked on by the group simultaneously using the applications collaboration toolset. Research limitations/implications: The research was carried out on one group consisting of six student architectural technologists working with one practising architect over a 12 week period. The author was the single observer to the project. Practical implications: This paper will support higher education institutions proposing to introduce collaborative BIM applications into a built environment curriculum and may also act as a catalyst to encourage educators to adopt a similar approach to teaching in a range of other professions. Originality/value: This paper identifies a potential for higher level learning facilitated by collaborative BIM technologies and methodologies. It also supports the need in higher education to provide for transition from theory to workplace practice.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: architectural technology; building information modelling; collaboration; education
Index terms: built environment, architect, profession, interaction, case study, higher education institution, building information modelling, higher education, studio, evidence, methodology, architectural technologist, collaboration, collaborative design, architectural technology
Subjects: educational institutions, behavioral psychology, information systems, infrastructure and transport systems, research methods, design practice, management, profession, construction type, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, practitioner, institututions, design methods
Topics: Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Education, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here